On May 9, BRUTE (Blue Route Utility Transmission Elimination) members presented personal examples of frustration with EPCOR’s and AltaLink’s public consultation process. They cited mailing errors where residents were informed that the route near them would not be considered anymore, whereas they later found out that they were living along the Applicants’ alternate route which was very much still being considered. Heartland Project team staff told some of the residents not to worry because the Applicant was only considering an alternate route because they had to, but that the line would be built in the Applicants’ preferred route.
Residents indicated they had been ignored by AltaLink and EPCOR. They were losing trust in the Alberta Government and big industry because of legislation the government had passed to streamline the process for power companies to build new lines. They pointed out the importance of some of the environmentally sensitive areas along the alternate route and how an overhead line would negatively affect these. Residents spoke about the stress brought on by the flawed consultation process, and about their concerns regarding effects of high voltage lines on cancer and other health problems.
Some of the BRUTE members felt that the Heartland line should be built in the Applicants’ preferred route in the Edmonton and Sherwood Park Greenbelts, because from their perspective that’s what the land was set aside for. (On the other hand, residents who live along the Sherwood Park Greenbelt point out that the 1974 legislation that established the Restricted Development Area indicates that the Minister may only approve activities in the Greenbelt that are compatible with agriculture, the propagation of plants and animals, and preservation of the environment.)
Economic impact analyses were conducted for 2 businesses that would be negatively affected by an overhead line. Land appraisal experts pointed out property devaluations of up to 22% for residential properties along the alternate route.
The Sturgeon Landowners Group (SLG) presented a panel of residents in the evening who spoke about the impacts of an overhead line on them. Because the RETA blogger unfortunately missed this session, please refer to the AUC transcripts for details of these presentations.
~ by RETA on May 11, 2011.
Posted in Alberta Government, Alberta Utilities Commission, AltaLink, BRUTE, Environmental Impacts, EPCOR, Health Impacts, Heartland Transmission Project, Property Value Impacts, Public Consultation, Socio-economic Impacts, Sturgeon Landowners Group Tags: Alberta Government, Alberta Utilities Commission, AltaLink, AUC Heartland hearing proceedings, Blue Route Utility Transmission Elimination, EPCOR, Heartland Transmission Project, power line cancer risks, power line environmental impacts, power line health impacts, power line property value impacts, power line socio-economic impacts, public consultation, Restricted Development Area, Sherwood Park Greenbelt, Sturgeon Landowners Group
Oct 18: Why do governments in Canada continue to give AltaLink's parent company, SNC-Lavalin, lucrative contracts when the company has become a national embarrassment?
Oct 16: AltaLink's parent company stock drops as 2013 profit forecast slashed.
Oct 14: Overhead power lines cause more aircraft accidents, injuries and death.
Oct 5: Investigations into alleged corruption at AltaLink's parent company, SNC-Lavalin, in Canada continue.
Oct 3: More studies indicate negative health effects of overhead high voltage power lines.
Sept 27: Frisco, Texas residents don't want an overhead power line proposed by Brazos Electric; Frisco City Council to study benefits of burying it.
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive free notifications of new posts by email.
Blog at WordPress.com. Customized ChaoticSoul Theme.
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
Join 60 other followers